Saturday, 20 February 2016

Proposal

We were given a sheet to fill about our visual response in connection with our essay . THat doesn't mean our sketchbook need to be just focus on the essay question, more likely the essay question as starting point and from there , we can have different approach related with our essay.

After the Southpark research , I think i'm gonna focus my visual practice on my sketchbook on Satire. I found this topic very interesting and I wish to produce artwork related to satirical cartoons through illustration to talk about the injustices of our world using a bit of humour .

This is the proposal from my visual Response :

THEMES I AM GOING TO EXPLORE ARE:

  1. Propaganda
  2. Social/Cultural/Religious
  3. Caricatures
THEORIES THAT WILL IN FORM MY WORK ARE:
  1. Consumerism 
  2. Satire
  3. Persuasion
SPECIFIC SUBJECTS THAT I WANT TO INVESTIGATE ARE:
  1. Political Cartoons
  2. Satirical illustration
  3. Contemporary society 
IN ORDER TO VISUAL INVESTIGATE THIS CONTENT I WILL
  1. Watch satirical cartoons to absorb the essence of satire (SouthPark,The Simpsons,Family Guy)
  2. Look at Satirical Illustrators found on newspapers,comic strips, internet media
  3. Investigate through social media the injustices from nowadays 


Monday, 1 February 2016

Essay first Draft

Satire and Persuasion : The power of Political and Popular cartoons on Contemporary Society


This essay will examine and discuss which role plays illustration during periods of social and political upheaval. In order to stablish a point of interest, the essay will be primarily focus on Political/Popular cartoons and the impact that cause and had caused cartoons in our society during the 21 century. There will be also an approach to some of the techniques used in political and popular cartoons such as persuasion and satire. In order to support this analysis, this essay will also examine the work of various artists to explore the theory behind them through comparison between some of the most polemic and controversial cartoons from our century such as South Park ( Trey Parker, Matt Stone), The Simpsons and Futurama (Matt Groening ).

Introduction

The Muhammad cartoons Crisis or also called “ Yllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy” after the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten made public a series of 12 editorial cartoons on 30 September 2005, whose most of them showed Muhammad. Since then, there has always been a forbidden taboo and debate about representing visually a religious figure from the Islam. Probably the origins of this fear came with the murder of Theo Van Gogh, which was killed by cold hands on the streets of Amsterdam by the Islamist militant Mohammed Bouyeri. The reason? Theo Van Gogh recorded a 10 minutes long short film about criticising how the Islamic society treat the women in their culture (Submission, 2004).

This tragical fact created a thin line between ethics and morals, between right or wrong because now artists would think twice before illustrate some polemic themes or topics such as religion either on newspaper, books, editorials, tv or any kind of media being honest. This is due to the strong tradition of aniconism ( the absence of material representations of the natural and supernatural world, which it may extend from only God and deities to saint character, all living beings and everything that exist, Wikipedia) that Islam posses, considering this as a high blasphemy against Muslims.

In 2016 ( nowadays) , artists still find this a problem and a annoying barrier to their freedom of speech rights, although obiously there are some more than others. In this particular case, the famous and polemic american cartoon show “ South Park” it is worldwide known by it's extreme satirical humour . “If there is a line, South Park has crossed it. If there is a distasteful joke, South Park has made it” (SouthPark :the greatest Modern satire). So what is the recipe for their success? The fact that posses the combination of satire, parody and mockery to the max, being able to ridicule every cultural and traditional values from every religion, country and society. That is their formula.
In a world where almost everything we do is probably going to offend someone in somewhere,
Trey Parker and Matt Stone (director and co-director) saw this and did not hesitate in using it as a advantage

As Brent Plate once mention “Blasphemy and the accusation of blasphemy is a culturally symbolic marker that helps define societies and religious traditions, as well as provide identities for people in terms of gender, race,class and sexuality. Some seemingly blasphemous images are ignored or overlooked by the masses , while religious and political authorities exploit other seemingly tame images. Oftentimes, those wit the most authority, politically and/or religiously, win the battle.But not always.”( S, Brent, Blasphemy :Art that offends, 27).


On the other hand , the assosiation of Canadian Editorial Cartoonist has stand against an Ottawa imam's petition for a law that prohibit the publication of “vulgar” cartoons that makes fun of religious figures.

“A cartoonist should absolutely be prepared to criticize what they see as poor behaviour by any human on the planet, whether a politician or religious figure. I find the whole concept of ‘you can’t touch them’ as pretty sad.”


Justice Frankfurther suggests “ definitions of blasphemy and related terms are slippery, subjective and susceptible to manipulation by those seeking power” (S.Brent, Blasphemy: Art that offends, 34) Due to this , the religious leaders seeing satirical cartoons as a menace against their beliefs, and they can't afford to see people from other religions mocking them, leaving them in a ' weak' position and as a 'joke' for their poor behavior in some aspects. But that is exactly what satire is all about. Robert Harris argues that there is a misunderstanding of meaning when society talks about satire and some of them it seems as contradiction in the term. Harris insist that the best definition of satire should be “A literary manner which blends a critical attitude with humour and wit to the end that human institutions or humanity may be improved.The true satirist is conscious of the frailty of institutions of man's devising and attempts through laugher not so much to tear them down as to inspire a remodeling” ( Thrall, et al 436) .

Having a closer look at South Park's episode's structure, it always starts with a specific theme or point of focus from the real world, passing by a stage of ridiculousness of the problem through exaggeration and parody until it gets to the end of the episode, where there is a strong but sincere and honest message coming out by one of the children's protagonists mouth, which it resemble the innocence of children. To support this idea, Robert Harris summarise the real intention of South Park's satire arguing that “the best satire does not seek to do harm or damage by it's ridicule, unless we speak of damage to the structure of vice, but rather it seeks to create a shock of recognition” .(Robert Harris , Purpose and Method of Satire).

The episode deals a critic against how cults exists in contemporary society and their ways of persuasion and manipulation upon their followers in order to increase their number. The famous magician/illusionist John Blake interprets the role of the religious leader of this cult ( fiction) due to his real ability to make 'miracles' , which it reminds to the same miracles quoted on one of the most read book of all times.The Bible and its iconic figure, Jesus Christ. Another scene from the episode, shows Stan, one of the protagonist which realised that John Blake is brain washing their followers and go to ask for help to Jesus. He tries to convince of his 'power' by showing him how he can multiply fishes and bread, one of the miracles quoted in the Bible, which after the poorly astonishment that Stan shows, Jesus rapidly added “ I guess this trick worked better with people 2000 years ago”. The comparison stablished is a parody of the Christianism , providing the christians spectator a new point of view . The directors never mentioned directly, more likely it feels like an invitation to reconsider and rethink about religion position on the 21 century.
At the end of the episode, as it was mention before, this stage is about revealing the true message behind all the jokes and nonsense during the episode. This time, after defeating Blake, Stands says “ We don't need religion to tell you how to live. Cults are dangerous because they promise you happiness, hope and even sometimes afterlife, but in return they demand you to pay money.Any religion that requires to get money in order to move up is wrong”.


I'm strongly agreed with Robert Harris and its perspective about satire. This episode target was not to provoke all the different religions at the same time as some people might think, but to make the viewers aware of in an open way. And if in somehow, made people consider about it, then South Park achieve its intentions.



Personal comments 

  • I haven't even finish the number of words we need to do. Need to work on that asap
  • Haven't include the biography sheet on the draft, I just missed ,the sources I based the draft from can be found on the blog in the previous posts tho 
  • I haven't make the analysis of illustrations ( I didn't do it because i was expecting on my tutorial with Richard seek for advice. I dont know if including south park images from episodes will be valid to talk about in my essay as the image analysis ) 
  • Need to write the conclusion , but to do so, i first need to fix the image issue